Applicants sought modification of consent terms reducing settlement amount from Rs. 3.5 crores to Rs. 3 crores. Respondent agreed to substitution; High Court allowed application and substituted figure.
Total consideration of Rs. 3,50,00,000/- substituted by Rs. 3,00,00,000/-.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 373 OF 2007
IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 73 OF 2004
VALLABH V.JUWARKAR AND ANR., Versus
SHRI DIGAMBAR V. JUWARKAR, (DEC) THROUGH LR'S NAVELIM GOA.
... Applicants
... Respondent
Mr. Valmiki Menezes, Advocate for the applicants.
Ms. H. Fernandes, Advocate for the respondents.
Coram:A. P. LAVANDE, J.
Date:1st June, 2007
P.C.
Heard Mr. Menezes for the applicants and Ms. Fernandes for the respondent No.1. The parties along with their respective Counsel are present in the Court.
the respondent No.1. The respondent No.1 who is present in the Court today agrees to substitute the amount of Rs.3,50,00,000/- (Rupees three crores fifty lakhs only) by Rs.3,00,00,000/- (Rupees three crores only) as stated in para 5 of the consent terms and states that she would have no further claim for the balance amount of Rs.50,00,000/-.
A. P. LAVANDE, J.
ssm.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Misc. Civil Application for modification of consent terms regarding settlement amount, agreed between parties, deserves to be allowed.
Vallabh V. Juwarkar and Anr.
Shri Digambar V. Juwarkar (Dec) Through Lr's Navelim Goa
A. P. Lavande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
