The court recorded that parties reached a settlement via Consent Terms. Consequently, the Letters Patent Appeal was disposed of per the settlement, and the accompanying Civil Applications were dismissed with all interim orders vacated.
Letters Patent Appeal disposed per Consent Terms; Civil Applications dismissed; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 260 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 326 OF 2007
D.D. Kamble ... Appellant
V/s. Shanker Ghule & Ors. ... Respondents
Ms. Neeta Karnik for the Appellant
Mr. Prashant Jadhav for Respondent Nos. 1 and 8
Mr. R.M. Patane, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE: AUGUST 24, 2007
P.C .:-
1
been translated into Consent Terms, which are tendered in the Court. The parties confirm that they have signed the Consent Terms after the same have been read over, explained and understood by them by their respective learned counsel. Therefore, the Court may dispose of the Letters Patent Appeal in accordance with the Consent Terms, submit the learned counsel.
J.N. PATEL, J.
A.A. SAYED, J.
2
D.D. Kamble
Shanker Ghule & Ors.
J.N. PATEL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
