The appellant moved to withdraw Income Tax Appeal No.137 of 2005 alongwith the pending Notice of Motion. Due to low tax incidence, the court dismissed both proceedings as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Motion and Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Refund of Court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.236 OF 2005
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L.) NO.137 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai ...Appellant
V/s.
Mehul Finance & Investments P. Ltd....Respondent
Mr.A.N. Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE : 27TH AUGUST, 2007.
P.C. :
1.The tax incidence in this case is less than
Rs.4 lakhs. In view of the circular issued by the
C.B.D.T., the learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw
the Appeal alongwith the Motion. The question of law,
if any, is left open for consideration in appropriate
proceedings.
2.The Motion alongwith the Appeal stands
dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to
costs. Refund of Court fees as per rules. C.C.
expedited.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai
Mehul Finance & Investments P. Ltd.
F.I. RebellO
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court