Petitioner in a PIL unconditionally withdrew the prosecution, assuring the cessation of a protest demonstration. The High Court accepted the submission and dismissed the PIL as withdrawn.
PIL disposed of as withdrawn based on unconditional withdrawal submission by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
(CRIMINAL) PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 7 OF 2007
Manubhai Paragji Vashi ... Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. M.M. Vashi for the Petitioner
Mr. S.R. Borulkar, Public Prosecutor, with Ms. Usha Kejriwal, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the Respondents.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007
P.C .:-
Mr. M.M. Vashi, who appears for the petitioner, submits
that the petitioner seeks to unconditionally withdraw the Public Interest Litigation, and assures the Court, on behalf of the petitioner, that the proposed demonstration of protest is called off, and that the petitioner and his colleagues would join the inaugural function of the Courts at Dindoshi.
1
withdrawn.
learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public
Prosecutor.
J.N. PATEL, J.
A.A. SAYED, J.
2
Manubhai Paragji Vashi
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
J.N. PATEL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
