The High Court at Bombay disposed of a company petition that had been withdrawn after the parties settled the matter out of court pending admission. The petition was granted liberty.
The petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rp a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 62 OF 1999
.......................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda .
of Coram, appearances, Court’s .
Orders or directions and .
Registrar’s OrderCourt’s or Judge’s Order
.......................................................
Ms. Prerna Janvekar i/b.
M/s.Bhasin & Co.for petitioner.
CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.
DATE : 26th October, 2007.
P.C. :-
.Pending the admission the
petitioner and respondent company
has settled the matter out of
court. Based on that, the
learned counsel appeared for the
petitioner on written instruction
which is marked "X" affixed xerox
copy seeks to withdraw the
petition. The petition therefore
disposed of as withdrawn with
liberty.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Unidentified Petitioner
Petitioner Company
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court