Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

V.N.Dye Chem. Vs Phoenix Mills Ltd. — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2007)

Home
Bombay HC
2007
V.N.Dye Chem. Vs Phoenix Mills Ltd.V.N.Dye Chem. v. Phoenix Mills Ltd.

Dismissed

V.N.Dye Chem. v. Phoenix Mills Ltd.

Bombay HC4 Apr 2007CP/580/1978

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

O. O. C. J.

COMPANY PETITION NO.580 OF 1978

V.N. Dye Chem Vs. Phoenix Mills Ltd.

..Petitioner.

..Respondent.

WITH

COMPANY PETITION NO.385 of 1980

India Bibre Bag Mfg. Co. Vs.

Phoenix Mills Ltd.

..Petitioner.

..Respondent.

None for the Petitioners. Ms. Dipti Raja i/b Dhru & Co. for the Respondent.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
V.N. Dye Chem
respondent
Phoenix Mills Ltd.
petitioner
India Bibre Bag Mfg. Co.

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 4 Apr 2007 · April
Registered: 12 Dec 1212
Case no.: CP/580/1978

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from D.y. Chandrachud

Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Vs M/S. J.D.Carriers and Ors.
3 Apr 2007
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. Vs Nadeem Zakaria Maklai
3 Apr 2007
M/S. V.P. and Brothers Vs M/S. P.N.R. Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd.
3 Apr 2007
Capt.Manik Yashpal Whorra Vs M/S.Elbee Airlines Ltd.
4 Apr 2007

Cite this judgement

V.N.Dye Chem. v. Phoenix Mills Ltd., CP/580/1978 (BOM), decided on 4 April 2007.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

Parties & counsel

Dismissed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

^th April, 2007.

P.C. :

The Petitions have been placed for directions before the

Court. The Company Registrar has informed the Court that the proceedings are not traceable and in all probabilities the parties have

lost interest in pursuing the proceedings. Counsel appearing for the Respondent is present. In these circumstances, it would be

2

appropriate to pass the following order :

i) The Company Petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution;

ii) In the event that any of the Petitioners are interested in pursuing the proceedings arising out of the Company Petitions, the learned advocates concerned shall within a period of two weeks inform the Company Registrar and take steps within a period of four weeks thereafter for reconstructing the record. In that event, the Company Registrar shall place the Petitions before the Court for further directions;

iii) In the event that the Respondent company has already been wound up, the Petitioners would be at liberty to pursue their claims in liquidation.

DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

CNR

HCBM020001441978

Topic

Company and Corporate

Bench

D.y. Chandrachud

Disposal

DISMISSED

Seagull Packaging Vs Shalimar Tubes and Industries Ltd.

4 Apr 2007

Nyalchand P.Sangani Vs the Phoenix Mills Ltd.

4 Apr 2007