This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE.
COMPANY PETITION NO. 38 OF 2000
-------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office :
Memorandam of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearnaces,Courts’s :
orders or directions :
Prothonotaries orders. :
------------------------------------------------------------
None for the parties.
CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J.
DATED: 8th February 2007.
P.C.:
. None for the petitioner.
Yesterday, when this matter was called
out, none had appeared for the
petitioner. Consequently, this petition
was adjourned for a day so as to enable
the parties to appear before this Court.
Even today, nobody is present on behalf
of the petitioner. Petition is, thus,
dismissed for want of prosecution with no
order as to costs.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
V.C. Daga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court