dimple dineshbhai shah v. m/s sumex organics private Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the Company Petition extensively heard but not yet decided; court dismissed petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
COMPANY PETITION NO.265 OF 2006
Mr.Dimple Dineshbhai Shah. Vs. M/s. Vinergy International Pvt. Ltd.
...Petitioner.
...Respondent.
Mr. B.B. Parekh i/b. S. Ravindar for the Petitioner. Mr. Cyrus Ardeshir i/b. Madekar & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 15th March 2007. P.C.:
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner seeks
leave to withdraw the Company Petition, after the Petition has been extensively heard and before the judgment was dictated. The Company Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Mr. Dimple Dineshbhai Shah
M/s. Vinergy International Pvt. Ltd.
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court