The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise against the respondent in limine, without hearing arguments, relying on a prior judgment of the same court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 159 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Central
Excise, Mumbai-III. ... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Metropolitan Equipments &
Consultants Pvt.Ltd. ... Respondent.
P.S.Jetly i/b. H.P.Chaturvedi for the appellant.
Ms.Aparna Hindargi for the respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 25th April 2007.
P.C. :
----
. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
learned counsel for the respondent. Perused record.
. In view of the judgment of this Court in the
case of Commissioner of Central Excise v. Gaurav
Mercantiles Ltd., 2005 (70) RLT (Bom.), we are not
inclined to entertain this appeal. Appeal is
dismissed in limine.
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Commissioner of Central Excise v. Gaurav Mercantiles Ltd., 2005 (70) RLT (Bom.)Referred¶9
Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III
M/s. Metropolitan Equipments & Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
S. Radhakrishnan
V.C. Daga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court