Civil Application rejected as applicants seeking leave to intervene had no established right or interest.
Civil Application No. 2676 of 2007 rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
abs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2676 OF 2007
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6865 OF 2007
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of :
coram, appearances, Court’s Orders: Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and Registrar Orders:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.D.B. Sawant for the applicants/
interveners.
Mr.V.M. Thorat for the petitioners.
Mr.V.A. Sonpal, A.G.P. for respondents
no.1 to 4.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the
applicants who seeks leave to intervene
in the petition. We do not find that
any right or interest has been created
in favour of the interveners especially
when rules contemplate action of the
toddy shops. In the circumstances, the
civil application is rejected.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.) (S.B. MHASE, J.)
Intervenors
Petitioners
Respondents
Applicants
D.G. KARNIK
S.B. MHASE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court