Shailesh Kantilal Bakhai v. Sarita Shailesh Bakhai
Bombay HCCAM/243/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Civil appellate court imposed costs for delay, permitted withdrawal of litigation expenses, and listed the appeal for admission without resolving the merits.
What did the court decide?
Allowed condonation of delay with costs; withdrawal of litigation expenses; case listed for admission.
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Allowed condonation of delay with costs; withdrawal of litigation expenses; case listed for admission.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
rpa
¶2
:: 1 ::
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 243 OF 2006
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.19066 OF 2006
¶4
.......................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda .
of Coram, appearances, Court’s .
Orders or directions and .
Registrar’s Order Court’s or Judge’s Order
.......................................................
Mr. Devang R. Sanghavi for the
Appellant.
Ms. Devendra Sharma for the
respondent.
¶5
CORAM : J.N.PATEL AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
¶6
DATE : 9TH OCTOBER, 2007.
¶7
P.C. :-
¶8
. Heard.
¶9
2. For the reasons stated in
the application delay is condoned
with costs of Rs.500/-. The
costs to be paid within two
weeks. If the applicant fails to
¶10
:: 2 ::
deposit the sum of Rs.500/-, the
application to stand dismissed
without further reference to the
Court. The counsel for the
respondent is permitted to
withdraw the litigation expenses
of Rs.5000/- deposited by the
applicant in the Court. The
appeal be listed for admission
after two weeks.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
AI extract
J.N.PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court