Gunjan Adukia Agarwal v. Santosh Adukia
Bombay HCCAM/230/2007
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A one-line office note ordering the appellant wife time to file a civil application and requesting respondent to file an affidavit-in-reply.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
rpa
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 230 OF 2007
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.139 OF 2007
¶4
.......................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda .
of Coram, appearances, Court’s .
Orders or directions and .
Registrar’s Order Court’s or Judge’s Order
.......................................................
Ms. Shuchi Halwasia for the
Appellant.
Mr.Santosh Adukar for respondent.
¶5
CORAM : J.N.PATEL AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
¶6
DATE : 9TH OCTOBER, 2007.
¶7
P.C. :-
¶8
. Appellant wife seeks time
to file the Civil Application and
get it registerd in the office.
Copies be furnished to the other
side. Respondent to file
affidavit-in-reply on or before
next date. S.O. to 30th
¶9
October, 2007.
¶10
(J.N.PATEL,J.)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
P.C.
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
AI extract
J.N.Patel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Yashwant M. Gavand Vs the Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and Ors.
Noormohammed Khatri and 7 Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 3 Ors.
Narayan Shakharam Ghagare and Ors. Vs Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika, Mumbai, through Its Commissioner
Abdul Rashid Abdul Gani Turk Vs the Union of India and Ors.