The High Court of Bombay allowed a civil application seeking restoration of Family Court Appeal No. 95 of 2006, disposing of the application in terms of the prayer clause, and listed the appeal for admission.
The Civil Application was allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The Family Court Appeal was listed for admission after four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.189 OF 2007
WITH
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.95 OF 2006
Murad Akbar Sayyed & Ors.
V/s.
...Applicants
Saira Murad Sayyed...Respondent
Mr.Suresh Dubey, Advocate, for the Applicants.
Ms.Nilima Date, Advocate, for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.N. PATEL &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :
1.Heard.
2.This Civil Applicationis filed for
restoration of the Family Court Appeal No.95 of 2006.
The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer
clause (a).
3.The Civil Application stands disposed of in
the aforesaid terms.
4.The Family Court Appeal be listed for
admission after four weeks.
: 2 :
[A.A. SAYED, J.]
[J.N. PATEL, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the civil application for restoration of Family Court Appeal No. 95 of 2006.
Murad Akbar Sayyed & Ors.
Saira Murad Sayyed
J.N. PATEL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court