The applicant deposited Rs.50,000/- with time to deposit the balance. The high court extended time by eight weeks and disposed of the application. No substantive advisory ruling was given.
Time extended by eight weeks; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.56 OF 2007
IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.33 OF 2005
Suresh Shankar Choudhari
...Applicant
V/s.
The District Collector, Pune & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Nitin Mulye, Advocate, h/f. Mr.Girish S. Godbole,
for the Applicant.
Mr.M.P. Deshpande, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr.S. Pathak, Advocate,h/f. Mrs.Vinita V. Bakre for
Respondent No.3.
Mr.A.B. Desai, Advocate, for Respondent No.4.
DATE : 13TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :
1.The applicant is depositing a sum of
Rs.50,000/- and wants time to deposit the balance
amount of Rs.50,000/-.
2.On the applicant depositing a sum of
Rs.50,000/-, time is extended by eight weeks.
3.The Civil Application stands disposed of
accordingly.
Suresh Shankar Choudhari
The District Collector, Pune
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court