Disposed
Mrs. Supriya Girsh Rao v. State Transport Corporation
Bombay HCCAF/5413/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
rp a INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:: 1 ::
rp a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5413 OF 2007
IN
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4670 OF 2007
ON
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.9767 OF 2006
.......................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda .
of Coram, appearances, Court’s .
Orders or directions and .
Registrar’s OrderCourt’s or Judge’s Order
Mr.Prashant Patil i/b. Umesh
Mankapure for Appellants.
CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.
DATE : 26th October, 2007.
P.C. :-
.The appellant to under
take to remove office objection
within four weeks. Therefore
taking into consideration the
averments is made the application
is granted in terms of prayer
clause (a) and (b). The Civil
Application is disposed off.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
The Appellant
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court