Disposed
Mr. Uttam Kumar Rao v. Bank of India
Bombay HCCAF/4694/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4694 OF 2007
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2189 OF2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s OrdersCourt’s or Judge’s Orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mr.Pramod Nair for the applicant.
Mr. O.A.Das for respondent.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
DATED : 18th September, 2007.
P.C.
1. Considering the facts and
circumstances of the case and in
view of the grounds as raised,
the effect and operation of the
judgment is stayed on condition
of depositing the entire decretal
amount within two weeks.
2. The respondent bank to invest
the said money as per the normal
practice, pending the decision of
the first appeal.
3. The Civil Application is
disposed of, accordingly with
liberty.
( 2 )
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
Applicant
Respondent Bank
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court