In First Appeal no. 1296 of 2007, a Civil Application by a 72-year-old applicant seeking withdrawal of deposited funds was allowed subject to furnishing security for the satisfaction of the trial Court, and the application was disposed of accordingly.
Application allowed subject to furnishing security; disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Lsp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil Application no. 446 of 2007
in
First Appeal no. 1296 of 2007
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s order
Mr. Vikas Kolekar for the Applicant
CORAM:- Anoop V. Mohta, J
DATED:- 5th September, 2007.
P.C.
| . | The | applicant who | is | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aged 72 |
years, | moved | this | |
| application | for | withdrawal | of | |
| the amount |
as |
deposited | by | the |
| Respondent | Insur | ance | Co | mpany. |
| Considering | the | averment | s | made |
the application is allowed in
| terms | of | prayer | clause | (a) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| subject | to | furnishing | security | |
| to | the | satisfaction | of |
the |
| trial | Court. | The | Civil |
Application is disposed off
accordingly.
(Anoop V. Mohta,J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application by an applicant aged 72 years for withdrawal of a deposited amount should be allowed subject to furnishing security to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Applicant
Insurance Company.
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
