Court dismissed civil applications as infructuous. Property was already disposed of. First appeal referenced but no substantive decision details provided in this order.
Civil application 4422 of 2007 dismissed as infructuous with costs. Civil application 2427 of 2007 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4422 OF 2007
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2427 OF 2007
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1592 OF 2007
Vasant N. Karla @ Karle. .. Applicant.
vs.
Ulka Arvind Karla @ Karle. .. Respondent.
Mr. Vivek Salunkhe i/by A.B. Avhad for Applicant.
Mr. B.D. Joshi for respondent.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE: 12TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C.
. In view of the statements made in the affidavit
in reply that the property in question is already
disposed of, nothing survives in the civil application
and the same is dismissed as infructuous with costs.
2. In view of dismissal of civil application no.
2
4422 of 2007, the civil application no. 2427 of 2007
does not survive. The same is dismissed as
infructuous.
(J.N. Patel, J. )
(A.A. Sayed, J. )
Vasant N. Karla @ Karle
Ulka Arvind Karla @ Karle
J.N. Patel
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court