The High Court disposed of the applications as settled out of court. The appellant withdrew the mandatory deposit, and the matter was closed based on a settlement reached before the Tribunal.
Mandatory amount deposited withdrawn; matters disposed of as settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Lsp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.353 of 2007
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 332 OF 2007
IN
FIRST APPEAL(ST) NO.7562 OF 2006
Office Notes , Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Mr.S.M.Oak for the Applicant
Mr.Umesh Mankapure for Respondent nos. 1 to 5
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED : 4th October, 2007
P.C.
. The parties have arrived at settlement and accordingly by exhibit 20 before the Tribunal settled the matter by purshis
dated 13-8-2007. The order has
been passed accordingly.
2
to withdraw the mandatory amount deposited in this Court. The other side has no objection for the same.
[ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.]
Applicant
Respondent No. 1
Anoop V. Motta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
