The Court condoned a delay of 59 days in filing an appeal in a FER case, held that the affidavit established sufficient cause, and registered the appeal.
Delay of 59 days in filing the appeal was condoned and the appeal was registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
C.A.J.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1929 OF 2007
IN
FERA (ST) NO. 36110 OF 2003
Union of India and Anr. ... Appellants
Versus
M/s. Ratnam Exporters of Handicrafts Gems
& Jewellery ... Respondents
Mr. R.V. Desai with Mr. A.S. Rao with Mrs. S.V.
Bharucha i/by Shri. T.C. Kaushik for Appellants.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 10, 2007
P.C.:
. There is delay of 59 days in filing the appeal.
There is affidavit in support of the application.
On the consideration of the same facts, in our
opinion, the same would amount to sufficient cause.
Hence, delay condoned. Application made absolute in
terms of Prayer Clause (a).
. If the respondents are aggrieved,by this order,
liberty to the respondents to apply for recalling of
the order. Office to register the appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 59 days in filing the appeal amounts to sufficient cause. Stable
Union of India and Anr.
M/s. Ratnam Exporters of Handicrafts Gems & Jewellery
F.I. Rebello
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court