In a civil application seeking resolution of an appeal, the court noted abatement of the application and dismissal of the appeal against certain respondents. The delay in filing was condoned. The appeal survives solely against two duly served respondents who did not appear. It is a single-line disposal order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.149 of 2005.
IN
FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.7968 OF 2004.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office
memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court’sCourt’s or Judge’s orders.
orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shri S.N.Gawade, A.G.P.for the Appellant
CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J.
DATED : 10th October, 2007.
P.C.:
1.Office noting shows that the Application
stands abated as against Respondents Nos.2/1, 2/9
and 3/1. Office noting further shows that the
Appeal stands dismissed as against Respondents
Nos.1/2 to 1/9, 2/2 to 2/6. Respondents Nos.1/1
and 3/3 are duly served. None appears for them.
The delay in preferring the Appeal is condoned.
Application is disposed of. It is, however, made
clear that the Appeal will survive only against
Respondents Nos.1/1 and 3/3.
Judge.
Abhay S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court