The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a Criminal Revision Application as settled and consequently dismissed the connected Criminal Appeal as infringuous by consent.
Criminal Revision Application No. 507 of 2006 and Criminal Appeal No. 270 of 2006 were dismissed as settled and infructuous respectively.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APLICATION NO. 270 OF 2006
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 507 OF 2006
Kamalakshan Kaimal. .. Applicant.
vs.
Sarala Kamalakshan Kaimal. .. Respondent.
Mr. M.S. Raje i/by Pranali Kakade for Applicant.
Mr. K.V. Sasthe, APP for the State.
Coram: J.N. PATEL &,
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
Date: 7TH JUNE, 2007.
P.C.
. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that
the matter is amicably settled and, therefore, he does
not want to prosecute the revision application. The
revision application is dismissed as settled. No order
as to costs.
2. In view of the dismissal of the revision
application, criminal application does not survive.
The same also stands dismissed as infructuous.
(J.N. Patel, J. )
2
(A.A. Sayed, J. )
Kamalakshan Kaimal
Sarala Kamalakshan Kaimal
J.N. Patel
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court