The State of Maharashtra v. Badre Alam Abdul Jabbar
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge, Criminal Appeal No. 7221 of 2005. Application by State challenging acquittal under Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act Act. Leave to appeal refused due to lack of evidence proving serviceability and identification of seized property.
What did the court decide?
Leave to appeal refused.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7221 OF 2005
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2005
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..APPLICANT
V/S
BADRE ALAM S/O ABDUL JABBAR ..RESPONDENTS
MRS. M.M. DESHMUKH -APP FOR STATE.
NONE FOR RESPONDENTS.
CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J.
DATE : 12TH OCTOBER, 2007.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the acquittal of the respondent accused.
Whether the prosecution established that the seized property was serviceable Railway property.
Whether the lacunae in the recovery document and identification evidence warrant a conviction.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- respondent
BADRE ALAM S/O ABDUL JABBAR
Coram
V.M. KANADE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court