The criminal application was dismissed for want of prosecution. No substantive legal proposition or reasoning is provided in this one-line order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3019 OF 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office :
Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances,Court ’s :
orders or directions :
and Registrar’s orders. :
------------------------------------------------------------
None for the applicant.
Rajesh More, APP for the State.
CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J.
DATED: 24th September 2007.
P.C.:
----
. None for the applicant.
2. Application is dismissed for
want of prosecution.
JUDGE
The State
V.C. Daga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court