The High Court admitted the criminal appeal against an order of acquittal. The respondent, previously on bail, sought continuation of bail pending the appeal. The court exercised its power to grant bail.
Bail was granted to the respondent pending the appeal on the same terms as before the trial Court, requiring fresh bail bonds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2859 OF 2006
The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant
V/s
Shivshankar Revansiddha Kabade ..Respondent.
Ms. S.V. Gajare, APP for the State.
Mr. A.H. Patki, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J.
DATE : 3RD APRIL, 2007.
P.C.
. Heard Ms. Gajare, learned A.P.P. for the
applicant and Mr.Patki, learned Counsel for the
respondent. Perused the impugned Judgment. Leave to
prefer appeal against the order of acquittal is granted.
Appeal be registered.
2. Appeal is admitted.
3. Action be taken against the respondent/accused
under section 390 of Cr.P.C.
4. At this stage Mr. Patki, learned Counsel for
[2]
the accused/respondent makes a request that the accused
was on bail during the trial and therefore, he may be
granted bail without being arrested again.
5. Accused/respondent is granted bail pending the
appeal on same terms and conditions as before the trial
Court subject to his furnishing fresh bail bonds.
(J.H. BHATIA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the respondent pending the appeal against the order of acquittal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Shivshankar Revansiddha Kabade
J.H. Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court