The applicant filed a criminal application attached to a bail appeal but did not press it at the time of hearing. The court disposed of the matter with liberty to file after six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 961 OF 2007
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 785 OF 2007.
Sameer Ramazan Nadaf... ......... Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ..... ......... Respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda ) Court's or Judge' s Orders of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr.Ramesh R. Bhatkar, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.U.V.Nikam, APP for the respondent.
CORAM: A.P. DESHPANDE, J. 19.11.2007
PC:
Learned counsel for the applicant does not press the application for bail at this stage and seeks liberty to move application for bail after expiry of a period of six months. Application disposed of as not pressed with liberty to move the application for bail after a period of six months.
Sameer Ramazan Nadaf
The State of Maharashtra
A.P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
