In two criminal applications, the Bombay High Court allowed amendments to join the victim and complainant's family members as parties to enable them to avail compensation awarded earlier. The applications were disposed of accordingly.
Amendments allowed to join victim and family members as per Schedule 'A'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 347 OF 2007
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 120 OF 2004
Balrajsingh Brad ..Appellant
(Ori.Accused No.3)
versus
State of Maharashtra ..Respondents
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 348 OF 2007
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 251 OF 2005
Sarabjeet Sharma ..Appellant
(Ori.Accused No.1)
versus
State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr. Y. M. Chaudhary for the Appellant.
Ms. R. M. Gadhvi, APP for the Respondents -
State.
CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, &
SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATE : 22ND MARCH, 2007.
P.C.
1. Both the Applications are for amendment as
per Schedule ’A’ annexed to the applications, in
order to join the victim and the members of the
:2:
family of the complainant to whom compensation has
been awarded. Therefore, Both the Applications are
allowed. Amendment to be carried out as per
Schedule ’A’ to the Applications within two weeks
from today.
2. Both the Applications are disposed of
accordingly.
(SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)
Balrajsingh Brad
Sarabjeet Sharma
State of Maharashtra
D. G. Deshpande
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court