Dismissed
Mrs. Sushilabai N. Rungta v. Radheshyam Mangalchand Kedia and 11 Ors.
Bombay HCAPP/1052/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
| IN | THE ORDINARY |
HIGH COURT OF J ORIGINAL |
UDICATURE A CIVIL |
T BOMBAY JURISDICTION |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APPEAL NO.1052 |
OF | 2005 | ||
| IN | ||||
| CHAM | BER SUMMONS |
NO.964 O |
F 2005 |
|
| IN | ||||
| SUIT NO.114 |
OF | 1980 | ||
| Mrs Sushilabai Radheshyam M. |
N. Rungta v/s Kedia and ors. |
...Appellant ...Respondent |
||
| Mr R.A. |
Thorat, | Sr. Counsel with |
Mr V.B. |
Naik, Mr |
| M.L. Cha |
turvedi | and Mr J.S. |
Chandnani for |
Appellant. |
| Mr S.S. |
Shetye |
with Mr Ravi Goenka |
and Mr |
Prasad Lad |
| i/b M/s |
Goenka | Law and As |
sociates for |
Respondent |
| Nos.1, | 4, | 7 |
and | 8. |
| CORAM | : D.K. |
DESHMUKH AND |
J.H. BH |
ATIA JJ. |
| DATE | : 16TH |
OCTOBER | 2007. |
-2-
P.C.
:-
| 1. | The | appeal is not | on board | for hearing. | By | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| consent | of | parties, | appeal | is |
heard | finally. | On | a |
| motion | made | by | the | lear | ned c |
ounsel ap |
pearing | for |
| respondent | Nos.1, 4 |
, 7 |
and | 8, cha |
mber summo |
nses | Nos.964 | |
| of 2005 |
and | 965 |
of 2005, |
both | taken | out by |
the | defendant |
| No.1, | are | permitte | d to |
be | withdrawn | with | liberty | to |
| raise the |
sa | me objec |
tions at |
an | appropri | ate stage. |
As a |
|
| consequence | of |
withdrawal | of | chambe |
r summo |
nses, | the | |
| order | dated | 4th | October | 2005 | passed | on those |
chamber | |
| summonses | by the |
learned |
Sin | gle Jud |
ge does |
not | survive, | |
| rendering | this app |
eal infru |
ctuous. | A | ppeal is |
disposed | ||
| off as |
such. | Notic | es of |
motion | No.3584 | of 2005 |
and |
2651 |
of 2007 do not survive for consideration. Both the
notices of motion are disposed off.
. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly
authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary as
true copy.
. Certified copy expedited.
( D.K. DESHMUKH J.)
( J.H. BHATIA J.)
Mrs Sushilabai Radheshyam M.
N. Rungta
Kedia
D.K. DESHMUKH
J.H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court