A criminal appeal was disposed of as abated since the appellant was dead and there was no proof of instructions from heirs to prosecute.
The appeal was disposed of as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MSS
: 1 :
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 17 OF 1996
---------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office :
Memoranda of Coram, :
appearances, Court’s : Court’s or Judge’s Orders
orders or directions :
& Registrar’s orders. : .
---------------------------------------------------------
Mr. P. M. Pradhan for appellant
Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, APP
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.
DATED:-22/8/2007
P.C.:-
Shri Pradhan, the learned counsel
for the appellant states that the
appellant is dead. He further states
that he has no instructions from the
heirs of the appellant that they
desire to prosecute this appeal and
hence the appeal has abated.
In view of this appeal is disposed
of as having abated.
JUDGE.
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court