Disposed
Baliram Gopinath Sakhare v. the State of Mahrashtra
Bombay HCAPEAL/165/1996
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CONTINUATION SHEET NO.FARAD CONTINUATION…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MSS
: 1 :
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 165 OF 1996
---------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office :
Memoranda of Coram, :
appearances, Court’s : Court’s or Judge’s Orders
orders or directions :
& Registrar’s orders. : .
---------------------------------------------------------
Ms. Racheeta R. Dhuru h/f Mrs.
K. K. Pradhan for appellant
Ms. Rajeshree Gadhvi, APP
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.
DATED:-5/9/2007
P.C.:-
Ms. Racheeta Dhuru, the learned
counsel for the appellant states that
the appellant is dead. She submitted
a copy of the death certificate of the
appellant which is taken on record and
marked "X". She states that in view
of this the appeal has abated and it
does not survive.
In the circumstances, the appeal
is disposed of as having abated.
JUDGE.
Ms. Racheeta Dhuru (on behalf of deceased appellant)
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court