The court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw the suit as the parties had settled the matter. The suit was disposed of accordingly, with a direction for refund of court fees as per rules.
Permission granted to withdraw the suit; suit disposed of; refund of court fees directed as per rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AJN
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.696 OF 1991
Union Bank of India
... Plaintiffs
Vs.
Kanyalal Ramchand & Ors.
... Defendants
Mr. Jamshed Ansari i/b S. Mahomedbhai & Co. for the plaintiffs.
Ms. Parvathi i/b B.S. Chandnani for the defendants.
CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.
DATED : AUGUST 16, 2007.
P.C.:-
The learned counsel for the plaintiffs and the learned counsel for the defendants state that the plaintiffs and the defendants have settled the matter. The learned counsel for the plaintiffs seeks permission to withdraw the suit. The suit is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as such. Refund of court fees, if any, as per rules.
[SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.]
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
