This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
SUIT NO.358 OF 1992
Nalini Vinayak Joshi .. Plaintiff v/s. Neelkantha Vinayak Joshi and another .. Defendants
Ms. Anandita Sawant for the plaintiff. Ms. J.A. Sarkhot i/by Mr. V.P. Govilkar for the defendants.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 16TH JULY, 2007
P.C.
Counsel for the parties have tendered consent terms duly signed by the parties and their advocates. Parties are personally present in court and adopt the consent terms on the basis of which they pray that suit be disposed of and decree be drawn in terms of the consent terms.
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
