The Court dismissed a suit for non-prosecution after the Plaintiffs failed to appear on multiple dates, including the current hearing, leading the Judge to conclude they were uninterested in pursuing the matter.
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.1715 OF 1985
M/s.Otoklin Plants & Equipments Ltd.
...Plaintiffs
vs.
M/s.Transport Corporation of India Ltd. ...Defendant
None for the Plaintiffs
Mr.Ajay Panicker for the Defendant
CORAM: A.S.OKA,J.
DATE : OCTOBER 3,2007
P.C.:
1. On 28th August 2007 and on 4th September 2007 when this
suit appeared on board, none appeared for the Plaintiffs. The
suit was adjourned till today. When the suit is called out
today, none appears for the Plaintiffs. It is obvious that
the Plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the suit.
Hence, dismissed for non prosecution.
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit can be dismissed for non-prosecution in the absence of the Plaintiffs.
M/s. Otoklin Plants & Equipments Ltd.
M/s. Transport Corporation of India Ltd.
A.S. OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court