None appeared for the plaintiffs on the date of hearing after a previous absence; hence the suit in Suit No. 1703 of 1985 was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 1703 OF 1985.
M/s.Mahesh & Co. and others.... Plaintiffs.
Versus.
Elizabeth Pimenta and others.... Defendants.
None for the Plaintiffs.
CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J.
DATED : 8th October, 2007.
P.C.:
1.On 21st September 2007 though the Advocate for
the Plaintiff was not present, representative of the
Plaintiff was preset and at his request time was granted
of two weeks. Today when the suit is called out, none
appears for the Plaintiff. Hence the suit is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
Judge.
Abhay S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court