Petitioner prayed for withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to pursue legal remedy. High Court allowed withdrawal with liberty as prayed.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.856 OF 2005
| Vinay Saigal | Petitio | ner | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs. | ||||
| Union of India & ors. | Respo | ndents | ||
| Mr.Madhur Baya with Mr.N.S.Thackar for the petitioner. | ||||
| Mr.M.I.Sethna, Senior Counsel with Mr.Y.R.Mishra for the respondents. |
||||
| CORAM : R. M. LODHA & J.P. DEVADHA |
R,JJ . |
|||
| DATED : 9th March 2006 |
||||
| P.C. | ||||
| The learned counsel for |
the | petitioner | prays | for |
| withdrawal of this writ petition |
with | liberty | to | the |
| petitioner to pursue appropriate legal remedy for | ||||
| redressal of his grievance raised in the writ petition. | ||||
| 2. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with | ||||
| liberty as prayed. |
(R.M. LODHA,J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
Vinay Saigal
Union of India
R. M. LODHA
J.P. DEVADHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
