Writ petition adjourned to the lower authority for a decision; the court expressed no opinion on merits and kept all issues open.
Direction to respondent No.7 to take a decision on the pending appeal/revision within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No.8278 of 2006
Mr Shivaji Hanumant Sugare Petitioner. Vs Eknath Samaj Seva Sudharna Mandal & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr R.S.Apte i/b Mr. N.R Bubna for the petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane,Asst Govt. Pleader, for respondent Nos.4 to 7
CORAM: H.S. BEDI, C.J. , & V.M.KANADE, J.
DATE: 18th December, 2006.
P.C.:-
The primary objection raised by the learned Asst. Government Pleader is that the appeal/revision, which has been filed by the petitioner, is pending before respondent No.7. We accordingly request respondent No. 7 to take a decision on the said appeal/revision within a period of two months from today. We make it clear that we have not gone through the merits of the controversy and all issues are kept open.
CHIEF JUSTICE.
V.M.KANADE, J.
Shivaji Hanumant Sugare
Eknath Samaj Seva Sudharna Mandal
H.S. BEDI
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
