Vinod Vasant Thakare v. the Collector-Thane and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition was dismissed because disputed questions of fact were raised, relegating the petitioner to a civil suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7264 OF 2006
Vinod Vasant Thakare ..Petitioner
Versus
The Collector,Thane and others
...Respondents
Mr. S.S. Lanke for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for the State.
CORAM : H.S. BEDI, C.J., & V.M. KANADE, J.
DATE: DECEMBER 11, 2006 .
P.C.
We find that disputed questions of fact have been raised in this petition. The petitioner is relegated to the remedy by way of a civil suit. This petition is accordingly dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V.M. KANADE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition is maintainable when disputed questions of fact exist.
Vinod Vasant Thakare
The Collector, Thane
H.S. BEdi
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court