Petitioner's writ petition seeking clarification was disposed of. The Court permitted the petitioner to apply to be impleaded in a related writ petition (No. 4677 of 2006) to seek the necessary clarification there.
Petitioner permitted to apply for impleadment in Writ Petition No.4677 of 2006 to seek clarification.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7138 OF 2006
Mahendra Kumar Modi
...Petitioner
V/s.
Employees Provident Fund Organisation & Ors.
...Respondents
Shri N.R. Bubna for the Petitioner.
Shri Suresh Kumar for Respondent No.1.
Shri V.Y. Jadhav for Respondent No.2.
Shri S.V. Bharucha with Shri N.D. Shrma instructed by Shri G.V. Mishra for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : H.S. BEDI, C.J., & V.M. KANADE, J.
DATED : DECEMBER 5, 2006.
P.C. :-
petitioner seeks, must be taken in Writ Petition No.4677 of 2006.
that as the petitioner is not a party to those proceedings and
as such, cannot claim any clarification in that matter.
the necessary clarification.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V.M. KANADE, J.
Mahendra Kumar Modi
Employees Provident Fund Organisation
H.S. BEDI
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
