The petitioners withdrew two writ petitions filed under Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The High Court recorded the withdrawal letters and disposed of both WP Nos. 6110 of 1995 and 5110 of 2005 accordingly.
Writ petitions allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6110 OF 1995
Miss.Anita Madhukar Patil ...PETITIONER.
Vs.
Dy.Director of Education,
Pune Region, Pune & Ors. ...RESPONDENTS.
....
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.5110 OF 2005
Dr.Anita Madhukar Patil ...PETITIONER
Vs.
State of Maharashtra ...RESPONDENT.
Mr.Prathamesh Bhargude h/f. Mr.A.V.Anturkar for the
Petitioner.
Mr.P.J.Pawar for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : 22ND AUGUST, 2006.
P.C.:-
. Mr.Bhargude holding for Mr.Anturkar states that
he has instructions to withdraw the writ petitions.
Writ petitions are accordingly allowed to be
withdrawn and are disposed of as such.
. Letter addressed by the petitioner to
Mr.Anturkar instructing him to withdraw the writ
petitions, is taken on record.
[SMT.RANJANA DESAI,J.]
2
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Anita Madhukar Patil
Dy. Director of Education, Pune Region, Pune
Anita Madhukar Patil
State of Maharashtra
Ranjana Desai
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court