The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous based on instructions from the petitioners' counsel. No order as to costs. Did not decide any substantive issue.
dismissed the petition and no order as to costs
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.3358 OF 2002
Shirishkumr Rupchand Gandhi & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Petitioners.
...Respondents.
Mr. P.R. Arjunwadkar for the Petitioners. Mr. V.P. Malvankar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : F. I. REBELLO AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ.
February 22, 2006 .
P.C.
On instructions, the Learned Counsel states that the
petition has become infructuous. The petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
( F. I. Rebello, J.)
( Dr.D. Y. Chandrachud, J.)
Shirishkumr Rupchand Gandhi & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
F. I. Rebello
Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
