In this criminal writ petition challenging detention, the High Court of Bombay at Bombay held the petition infructuous and disposed of the matter as the claimant's detention period had ended.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3210 OF 2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court’s orders
or directions and Registrar’s Courts or
Orders. Judge’s orders
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.Tripathi for the petitioner.
Mrs. Pai for the State
CORAM : S.B.MHASE &
S.R.SATHE, JJ.
DATED : 24th Nov., 2006.
-------
P.C:
Heard
Learned Counsel Mr. Tripathi
states that the detention period
is over and therefore the
petition is rendered infructuous.
Petition disposed of as
infructuous.
Rule discharged.
(S.R.Sathe,J.) (S.B.Mhase,J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State
S.B.Mhase
S.R.Sathe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court