The High Court of Bombay dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn, noting the petitioner intended to file a representation regarding encroachment instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION NO.2909 OF 2006
Pankesh Diwanchand Chugasrani. Vs. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Anr.
...Petitioner.
...Respondents.
Mr. Shashipal Shankar for the Petitioner. Mr. G.D. Utangale i/b. Utangale & Co. for Respondent No.1. Mr. Milind More, AGP for the State. Mr. J. S. Anand for the Developer.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
December 6, 2006 .
P.C.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner seeks
permission of the Court to withdraw the petition since the Petitioner seeks to move a representation to the Deputy Collector, Encroachment.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that
a copy of the representation shall also be furnished to the Developer who has intervened in these proceedings.
The Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Pankesh Diwanchand Chugasrani
The Slum Rehabilitation Authority
The State
The Developer
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
