Disposed
Prakash H. Dugad v. Muncipal Corpn. of Gr. Mumbai
Bombay HCWP/2775/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
.[1].
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
WRIT PETITION NO.2775 OF 2004
¶4
Prakash Hirachand Dugad ...Petitioner.
Versus
Municipal Corporation of
Greater Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents.
¶5
....
None for the Petitioner.
....
¶6
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : JULY 05, 2006.
P.C.:
¶7
. It is the case of the petitioner that
Respondent No.7 has carried out illegal
construction and Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 have
failed to take action. Considering the
controversy, we direct Respondent No.3 or if he is
not competent officer, the competent officer to
¶8
examine the complaint made by the petitioner and
after hearing the petitioner and Respondent No.7
to pass appropriate orders according to law. The
entire action to be completed within 12 weeks from
today. With the above observation petition stands
disposed of.
¶9
[F.I.REBELLO,J.]
¶10
.[2].
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Prakash Hirachand Dugad
- respondent
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Coram
AI extract
F.I. REBELLO
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court