evidence of Mr. R. R. Rodrigues who was working as an Engineer in the Engineering/ Maintenance Department. In the course of his examination-in-chief the witness stated that the Petitioner was required to check reports from various departments of the hospital relating to maintenance/ repair work, assess the material that would be required for carrying out the work of repair, order supplies from the stores department and to give them to tradesmen and helpers with specific directions to do the work from day to day. In the course of his cross examination, the witness inter alia stated that while a duty list was provided to the complainant workman, he was unaware of whether the duty list was produced on the record. The witness admitted that carpentry work is technical work. The witness stated that he had no documentary evidence to show that several workers were working under the supervision of the Petitioner herein. The witness further admitted that there was absolutely no record showing that the complainant was placing orders for material from the stores department. Finally, the witness also admitted that while he used to call meetings of all the persons working in the Maintenance Department from the supervisory category, but the complainant workman was never called for such meetings. Evidently the material aspects of the evidence both of
