Petition not pressed due to status of a related revision application; disposed of without deciding merits.
The petition was disposed of without deciding the merits as it was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION NO.2314 OF 2006
Airports Authority of India.
...Petitioner.
Vs.
The Minister of State for Revenue
and Forest Department & Ors.
...Respondents.
Mr.Karl Shroff i/b.Bhaishankar Kanga and
Girdharilal for the Petitioner.
Ms.Geeta Shastri, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
September 4, 2006.
P.C. :
The learned AGP appearing on behalf of
Respondent Nos.1, 2, 3 and 4 states that the
revision (Revision Application No.7 of 2006) shall
be disposed of by the Revisional Authority within a
period of three months from today. In that view of
the matter, the Petition is not pressed. All
rights and contentions of the parties are kept
open. The petition is disposed of.
Airports Authority of India
The Minister of State for Revenue
Forest Department & Ors.
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court