Allowed

The Maharashtra State of Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. Pratap Narandas

Bombay HC5 Apr 2006WP/2313/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and time to vacate suit premises. The court granted permission to withdraw and allowed the petitioner one year to vacate the premises upon undertaking.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw petition granted; petitioner allowed one year to vacate suit premises upon furnishing undertaking.

The Maharashtra State of Co-Operative Bank… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2006)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶2

 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

 WRIT PETITION NO. 2313 OF 2006

¶4

 The Maharashtra State Co-op.
 Bank Ltd. ... Petitioner

¶5

V/s

¶6

 Pratap Narandas ... Respondent

¶7

 Mr. B.G. Vidya for the petitioner.

¶8

 Mr. P.R. Dhakephalkar i/by Divyakant Mehta &
 Associates for the respondent.

¶9

CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J.

¶10

DATED: 5TH APRIL, 2006

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

 1. Heard learned counsel for both parties.

¶13

 2. After hearing both parties, in the course of the

¶14

 argument, finally, the learned counsel for the
 petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition
 and made submission that some time should be granted to
 him to vacate the suit premises.

¶15

 3. In view of the facts and circumstances, the
 permission to withdraw the petition is granted.

¶16

¶17

 Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as

¶18

 to costs.

¶19

 4. The petitioner is a Co-operative Bank and,

¶20

 therefore, the petitioner is allowed one calendar year’s
 time from today to vacate the suit premises on
 furnishing undertaking to this Court to that effect and
 with condition that no third party interest would be

¶21

 created during the said period and they shall continue
 to pay the rent as agreed. The undertaking to be

¶22

 furnished within two weeks.

The Maharashtra State of Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. Pratap Narandas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Maharashtra State of Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. Pratap Narandas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganpat Sonu Tatkar Vs Bajrang Raghu Mane

Ravindra Vasant Shinde (Legal Heir of v.G.Shinde) Vs Narsinha Narayan Shirodkar and Ors.

Ankush Baburao Kawade Vs Tanaji Shankar Jadhav and Ors. .

Indian Overseas Bank Vs Chhotalal Laxmichand Vasa

The Maharashtra State Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Vs Pratap Narandas

Vinod Murji Savla Vs Jitendra Karsandas Thakkar and Ors.