Disposed
The Voltas Ltd. v. Shrik.D.Kochargkar and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/2207/1993
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vss
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2207 OF 1993
Voltas Limited ... Petitioner
V/s.
Smt.Shantabai J. Tambe ... Respondent
Mr.R.N. Salgaonkar for Petitioner
CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2006
P.C.:
. Respondent No.5A, who is present in Court,
represents Respondent Nos.5B and 5C, who are minors.
Consent terms signed by the Corporate Manager-Employee
Relations on behalf of the Petitioner and Respondent
No.5A and their respective advocates are taken on
record.
2. Writ Petition is dismissed as against Respondent
No.2. As regards Respondent No.3, the Petition is
allowed to be withdrawn against Respondent No.3 as the
dispute with Respondent No.3 has been settled out of
Court. Consent terms in respect of Respondent Nos.4, 6
and 7 had already been filed and the Writ Petition in
respect of those respondents had been disposed off.
3. Order in terms of consent terms.
4. Writ Petition is disposed off in terms of
consent terms.
Voltas Limited
Smt. Shantabai J. Tambe
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court