Petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition due to a subsequent M.O.U. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 181 OF 2003
Bharatiya Kamgar
Karmachari Mahasangh .. Petitioners.
vs.
G.K.W. Ltd., & Anr. .. Respondents.
Mr. G.S. Baj for petitioners.
Mr. C.U. Singh a/w Geetanjali Prabhu
i/by Vigil Juris for respondent no.1.
CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J.
DATE : 12th April, 2006.
P.C.:
. The learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners states that in view of the subsequent
M.O.U. entered into by the recognised union with
the management, nothing survives in the present
petition. He seeks leave to withdraw the present
petition. Petition is accordingly dismissed as
withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Bharatiya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh
G.K.W. Ltd.
S.U. KAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court