This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 163 OF 1999
Central Railway Patra Chawl Rahivasi ]
Sangh & Ors.] .. Petitioners
Versus
Assistant Engineer (Works), Railways ]
& Ors.] .. Respondents
Ms. Mahrukh Adenwala for the petitioners.
Mr. K.R. Belosay, AGP, for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
Mr. A.N. Samant for the respondent No.4.
CORAM: R.M. LODHA &
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED: 08TH FEBRUARY, 2006
P.C. :
.Ms. Mahrukh Adenwala, learned counsel for the
petitioners prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition.
We accept her statement and allow the Writ Petition to
be withdrawn.
Sd/-
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
[srpasha@hc]
Central Railway Patra Chawl Rahivasi Sangh & Ors.
Assistant Engineer (Works), Railways & Ors.
R.M. Lodha
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court