The Bombay High Court dismissed a review petition filed by Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd. Observing the petition was thoroughly misconceived with no grounds made out, the Court held all submissions were already considered and rejected in the original judgment.
The review petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
REVIEW PETITION NO.100 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 171OF 1999
Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd.
Vs. Shri Anand Shivram Samant & Anr.
...Petitioner.
...Respondents.
Mr. Sanjay Udeshi for the Petitioner. Mr. V. K. Pradhan for the Respondents.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
December 18, 2006 .
P.C.
The Review Petition is thoroughly misconceived. Every
one of the submissions which were urged before the Court has been considered in the judgment. The manner in which the Review Petition has been drafted leaves much to be desired. No
ground for review has been made out. The Review Petition is accordingly dismissed.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any ground for review has been made out under the judgment of the High Court.
Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd.
Shri Anand Shivram Samant & Anr.
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
